The Chief Judge of Rivers State, Justice Simeon Amadi, has explained why he declined to constitute a seven-member panel to investigate Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Nma Odu, amid ongoing impeachment proceedings.
In a letter addressed to the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Martin Amaewhule, Justice Amadi cited subsisting court orders restraining him from taking any action on the request by lawmakers.
The House of Assembly had, on January 16, invoked Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution and requested the Chief Judge to constitute a panel to investigate allegations of gross misconduct against the Governor and his deputy, following the commencement of impeachment proceedings.
However, Governor Fubara and Prof. Odu separately approached the Oyibo Division of the Rivers State High Court in Port Harcourt, where they obtained interim injunctions restraining the Chief Judge from receiving, considering, or acting on any request or resolution from the Assembly relating to the constitution of the panel.
In his response dated January 20, Justice Amadi confirmed receipt of both the Assembly’s letter and the court orders.
“My office is in receipt of two separate court orders of interim injunction issued on 16th January, 2026 in two suits, restraining the 32nd Defendant, the Hon. Chief Judge of Rivers State, from receiving, forwarding, considering or howsoever acting on any request, resolution, articles of impeachment or other documents from the Rivers State House of Assembly for the purpose of constituting a panel to investigate the alleged misconduct,” he stated.
The Chief Judge noted that although the lawmakers had appealed the interim injunctions, the doctrine of lis pendens requires all parties to maintain the status quo pending the determination of the appeals.
“Given the subsisting interim orders of injunction and the pending appeals, my hand is fettered. I am therefore legally disabled at this point from exercising my duties under Section 188(5) of the Constitution in this instance,” Justice Amadi said.
He emphasized the need for strict adherence to the rule of law and constitutional processes, stressing that all parties must obey court orders until they are set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction.