Magistrates’ Court

Ugochukwu Nnakwu, who appeared for the ex-governor, informed Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja, shortly after the case was called to hear his motion ex-parte.

The withdrawal followed Justice Abdulmalik’s observation, on Wednesday, when the matter was heard.

Reports that the judge picked holes in the suit for failure to specify the magistrate who was sued as 2nd defendant.

Nnakwu then sought an adjournment to properly identify the name of the magistrate being used.

Upon resumed hearing on Tuesday, Nnakwu informed the court that the matter was scheduled for the hearing of their motion ex-parte for substituted service of all court documents on the 2nd defendant (magistrate).

He, however, said that a motion to withdraw the suit against the 2nd defendant had been filed.

He said the motion, dated March 30, was filed same date.

“We urge my lord to strike out the name of the 2nd defendant as a party in this suit,” the lawyer prayed.

He equally asked the court to strike out their earlier motion ex-parte before the court.

Ezekiel Rimamsomte, who appeared for the police; Maimuna Shiru, who represented the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), and Abdul Mohammed, SAN, counsel for Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), did not oppose the application.

Justice Abdulmalik, in a short ruling, struck out the magistrate’s name from the suit and also struck out the motion ex-parte.

Nnakwu then sought an adjournment to enable him amend the suit.

But Mohammed disagreed with the lawyer’s request to amend the suit.

Mohammed, who called the attention of the court to reliefs one, two and three in the former governor’s suit, said the prayers complained about the magistrate’s search warrant issued to the investigating agency.

According to the senior lawyer, having struck out the name of the 2nd defendant, it means there is no case before this court.

Responding, the judge told Mohammed to be patient to allow the plaintiff to do his case the way he wants.

“Counsel (addressing Mohammed), you are jumping the gun. You can respond to this by filing a counter affidavit,” she said.

Justice Abdulmalik consequently adjourned the matter until June 17 at the instance of Nnakwu to enable him file an amended process.

Reports that El-Rufai is demanding a N1 billion in damages against ICPC, the Chief Magistrate at the Magistrate’s Court of the FCT, Abuja; I-G and the AGF, named as 1st to 4th respondents respectively.

The former governor, in an originating motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/345/2026, dated and filed Feb. 20 by Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, sought seven reliefs.

He prayed the court to declare that the invasion and search of his residence at House 12, Mambilla Street, Aso Drive, Abuja, on Feb. 19 at about 2pm by the and ICPC and I-G, amounts to a gross violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights .

He said that it was a violation to dignity of the human person, personal liberty, fair hearing, and privacy under Sections 34, 35, 36, and 37 of the Constitution.”

He urged the court to declare that “any evidence obtained pursuant to the aforesaid invalid warrant and unlawful search is inadmissible in any proceedings against the applicant, as it was procured in breach of constitutional safeguards.”

El-Rufai, therefore, sought an order of injunction restraining the respondents and their agents from further relying on, using, or tendering any evidence or items seized during the unlawful search in any investigation, prosecution, or proceedings involving him.

He sought an order directing the Ist and 3rd respondents (ICPC and I-G) to forthwith retum all items seized from the applicant’s premises during the unlawful search, together with a detailed inventory thereof.

He also sought an order awarding the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira) as general, exemplary, and aggravated damages, among others.

Responding, in its counter affidavit, the ICPC said it received a petition against El-Rufai and acting on the petition, it commenced an investigation, leading to the search at his residence.

It argued that its operatives acted under a valid search warrant issued on Feb. 18 and executed on Feb. 19 between 1:37pm and 3:56pm at 12 Mambilla Street, Asokoro, Abuja.

The commission said its officials were accompanied by personnel of the Nigeria Police Force, and that the exercise was witnessed by El-Rufai’s wife, Hadiza El-Rufai, and his son, Mohammed El-Rufai.

The ICPC, which urged the court to dismiss the suit, listed the items allegedly recovered from the residence.

The police, also in its counter affidavit deposed to by Insp Ewa Anthony, argued that it had the statutory power to detect, arrest, investigate and prosecute offenders.

It argued that the search carried out at El-Rufai’s residence was executed pursuant to a search warrant issued by a competent court of law.

It disagreed with the ex-governor that that search warrant was invalid, insisting that it was a genuine court order.

It said that its officers who carried out the operation, complied with all applicable legal procedures in the execution of the search warrant.

According to the police, the applicant is trying to use the honourable court to shield him away from the security investigation and prosecution in the court of law.

It, therefore, prayed the court to dismiss the suit in its entirety.(NAN)