Fani-Kayode Slams Twitter Co-founder, Jack Dorsey Over His Reasons For Trump’s Ban

By Chris Udochukwu

Abuja (Precise Post) – Nigeria’s former , has slammed the co-founder and CEO of Twitter, Jack Patrick Dorsey over his reasons for banning Donald Trump from twitter.

Fani-Kayode who dismissed the reasons given for the justification of the ban with a wave of hand, however said the action was a reflection of Jack’s pathological hatred for Trump and those on the right. Stressing that he took great pride and pleasure in doing what he did – an action he said was tantamount to shutting out alternative voice and silencing a great man.

Precise Post recalls that Trump was accused of using the instrumentality of the twitter to make comments considered to constitute threat to public safety.

Jack Dorsey who took to his twitter handle to explain why Trump was said:

I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter, or how we got here. After a clear warning we’d take this action, we made a decision with the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter. Was this correct?

I believe this was the right decision for Twitter. We faced an extraordinary and untenable circumstance, forcing us to focus all of our actions on public safety. Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and above all.

That said, having to ban an account has real and significant ramifications. While there are clear and obvious exceptions, I feel a ban is a failure of ours ultimately to promote healthy conversation. And a time for us to reflect on our operations and the environment around us.

Having to take these actions fragment the . They divide us. They limit the potential for clarification, redemption, and learning. And sets a precedent I feel is dangerous: the power an individual or corporation has over a part of the global .

The check and accountability on this power has always been the fact that a service like Twitter is one small part of the larger happening across the . If folks do not agree with our rules and , they can simply go to another service.

This concept was challenged last week when a number of foundational tool providers also decided not to host what they found dangerous. I do not believe this was coordinated. More likely: companies came to their own conclusions or were emboldened by the actions of others.

This moment in time might call for this dynamic, but over the long term it will be destructive to the noble purpose and ideals of the open . A company making a business decision to moderate itself is different from a government removing access, yet can feel much the same.

Yes, we all need to look critically at inconsistencies of our policy and . Yes, we need to look at how our service might incentivize distraction and harm. Yes, we need more transparency in our moderation operations. All this can’t erode a free and open global internet.

The reason I have so much passion for # is largely because of the model it demonstrates: a foundational internet that is not controlled or influenced by any single individual or entity. This is what the internet wants to be, and over time, more of it will be.

We are trying to do our part by funding an initiative around an open decentralized standard for . Our goal is to be a client of that standard for the layer of the internet. We call it @bluesky:

This will take time to build. We are in the process of interviewing and hiring folks, looking at both starting a standard from scratch or contributing to something that already exists. No matter the ultimate direction, we will do this work completely through public transparency.

It’s important that we acknowledge this is a time of great uncertainty and struggle for so many around the world. Our goal in this moment is to disarm as much as we can, and ensure we are all building towards a greater common understanding, and a more peaceful existence on earth.

I believe the internet and global public conversation is our best and most relevant method of achieving this. I also recognize it does not feel that way today. Everything we learn in this moment will better our effort, and push us to be what we are: one working together.

However, in his reaction, Fani-Kayode said:

“Stop kidding yourself. You took great pride & pleasure in doing what u did. It was sadistic & it reflected ur pathological hatred for Trump & those on the right. You shut out an alternative voice & u sought to silence a great man. It was a of trust & an abuse of power!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *